Blended Update #2 - Marcia Kish Conference
It’s time for a Blended Update! As a reminder, this year Dawn Bodden is blending her section of Geometry and I’m blending a section of Honors Spanish 3. Here’s a post I wrote back in September about our initial experience with blending our classes.
As with any pilot, there is a learning curve and lots of trying of new ideas, strategies, activities, etc. Speaking for myself, I was pleased with some of the blending and what the students were achieving, but kept thinking, “I know there’s more we can do!” While I thought that the students were progressing well and as expected in an Honors Spanish 3 class, to me, the purpose of blending is to better meet the individual needs to each learner. And while I was providing them with the time and space to do work in a variety of ways, I kept coming back to the idea that there was something more that we could be doing to achieve that goal of more personalized learning within our classroom.
On November 17, Dawn and I attended a “Blended and Personalized Learning Conference” presented by +Marcia Kish. During the conference, we learned about how Marcia implemented a specific model in her elementary classroom to lead to greater student-led and personalized learning. Marcia shared that she moved to a wonderfully progressive and personalized model in her classroom in a series of three phases. The first phase is straight up “Station Rotation”. The beauty with Marcia’s station rotation is that it leverages technology to help engage students and also provide information in the form of data to her. In her classroom, she sets up four stations. Here is a brief breakdown of the four stations:
Station 1 Mini-lesson
In this station, the teacher directly teaches the students or works with them directly on a task specific to the topic.
Station 2 Independent Practice
In this station, students work on something on their own. Given that students could be at this station before the mini-lesson, Marcia recommends
doing something that has 4 review questions, 2 new questions, and 2 real-life questions.
Station 3 Digital Content
In this station, students access some sort of technology that can provide the teacher with feedback on student progress. Examples are Khan Academy, FrontRowEd, EdPuzzle, Newsela, a textbook website/program, etc.
Station 4 4 Cs
In this station, students work on the four Cs: creativity, collaboration, communication, and critical thinking in a wide variety of activities that fit the goal content/skills.
These four stations are completed by all students for a set amount of time (10 minutes in Marcia’s classes).
In the second phase, the four stations are the same, but now the time element has been removed. Students are able to work through the stations at their own pace. If a student needs to spend more time with the teacher or needs more time to work on a specific task, it’s available to them. This phase also allows teachers to differentiate instruction to a couple of levels of students and to use data to drive the decisions for those levels.
In the third phase, the classroom really becomes differentiated and very personal. Students work at their own pace and in a variety of different ways to achieve the learning objectives. Students can choose a variety of different activities/projects geared toward their personal learning needs. As Marcia stated in her conference handout “students work at their own pace, place, and path while being driven by data.” In this phase, students could potentially be working on various activities outside of both the physical classroom and/or assigned class time.
The conference was really successful in that it got us thinking about what we are doing in our classes, what our goals are with blended learning, and what our path can be to achieve those goals. In the next blog post, I’ll share with you what I took from this conference to implement into my own classroom and what my next steps will be. Dawn and I are also working on a post with additional resources that would help anyone interested in trying out some of the above ideas.
Is there a topic you’d like to see on the blog? Give us some ideas and let’s get the conversation started!
Does it matter what stations students start at? For instance, can they be expected to start with practice or collaboration if they haven't been exposed to direct instruction on topic? This sounds really interesting!
ReplyDeleteIn this model, the student all start in different spots. This means you have to use the direct instruction time strategically. They can not "need" that instruction to do the days activity. When I tried this out, I used the time to dig deeper into a concept that we were already doing.
DeleteGreat question! At the conference, Marcia recommended doing stations that weren't dependent on the mini-lesson since some students wouldn't be at that station until the end. Marcia specifically addressed this at the conference when she talked about the independent practice station. In her classes, she gave the students eight "problems" - half of them were review, two were questions on new material that were a reach for the students, and two questions were real-life application of the content (new or old). Right now I'm working on a post to highlight how I tackled this in my class - mostly I started to think of it as a great way to review (which is super important in a language class), but I also thought of my lesson as spread out over multiple days. So, the mini-lesson I did on Monday was tackled individually and collaboratively by the students on Wednesday and the mini-lesson from Wednesday was tackled on Friday. More to come!
ReplyDeleteWhat about kids who do not like this kind of instruction? Did Either of you have students drop or add to a class of regular instruction within the first quarter of school this fall? What kind of feedback have they been giving you? In terms of Spanish--do they feel like they're still getting enough "teacher-talk/comprehensible input" and practice speaking/listening? Muchas gracias, Heidi
ReplyDelete